Transcendentalist

Transcendentalist                Transcendentalism is a philosophy of nature that holds that everything is estimation to a perfect type or standard, or the state or quality of being transcendental. A Baltimore clergyman defined transcendentalism as a new philosophical which has grew, upholding that noting is everything in universal, and everything is nothing in particular (Gohdes 8). However, one may further identify the senselessness of later attempts to describe transcendentalism if one assumes to study the utterances made on the subject by its advocates and their contemporaries.                Transcendentalism was popular in the early decades of the 19th century, and originates from Goethe and Platonism, the later tradition known in Germany as Naturphilosophie. On this explanation, species are ideal kinds and have no dissimilarity that is not humiliation of the type, and dissimilarity is seen as monstrosity. Transcendentalism also hypothesizes a difference between “understanding” or the standard means of apprehending truth through the senses, and “reasoning”, a superior, more instinctive form of perception. The discourse of transcendentalism supports as absolute such rhetorical and logical oppositions (Grusin 3).                It might be argued that Emerson was fundamentally a transcendentalist, because he normally set thoughts above actions. He wrote that action is with the scholar subordinate, but it is indispensable. Positively he called himself as idealist, and undoubtedly, he highlighted thoughts as the ultimate concern of the American Scholar. In this, he opposed with James, accentuated particular acts. In the later essay on “Nominalist and Realist”, Emerson absolutely categorized himself with the platonic realists, but was this approach contradictory with his embryonic “pragmatism”. Nothing was beyond from David Emerson himself churlish severity and capricious peculiarity (Holmes 151).                In history, Thoreau is considered transcendentalist because of his ideas, and having such “ideas” instead of “action” is considered transcendentalist. Thoreau shows immense rhetorical control in developing numerous persuasive influences against slavery (Dillman 11). He shows that the citizens of Massachusetts are ironically slaves themselves and that by honoring the deserter slave law, they believe slavery in their own state.                On the other hand, Hawthorne seems to be articulating the transcendental view of art, which can be encountered elsewhere in his writing that is why he was considered as transcendentalist. He even temporarily joined the transcendentalist utopian community in the Brook Farm (Baker 416). He also ridiculed the sanguinity of those who congregated to Emerson; specifically their easy refutation of the reality of evil and sin, in a number of outlines and gave full expression to his antitranscendental cynicism in The Blithedale Romance. He turned his back on the formations of his Puritan ancestors, and that he was too philosophical a rationalist to understand the mysticism that prowled at the center of Transcendentalist faith, he at least did not pledge to the doctrine of natural depravity of human nature. References:        Houston A. Baker, Columbia Literary History of the United States. (New York: Columbia University Press,1988) 427. Richard Dillman, The Major Essays of Henry David Thoreau. (Albany: Whitston Publishing, 2001) 11. Clarence L. Gohdes, The Periodicals of American Transcendentalism. (Durham: Duke University Press, 1931)  8. Richard A. Grusin, Transcendentalist Hermeneutics: Institutional Authority and the Higher Criticism of the Bible. (Durham: Duke University Press, 1991) 3. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Ralph Waldo Emerson. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1885) 151.

 

Credit:ivythesis.typepad.com